Suspense and mystique in the art world is alive and well, thanks to new details about the potential identity of the mysterious model, who famously became the Mona Lisa.
The dig is on-literally- to discover the identity of the Mona Lisa. In Florence, Italian scientists will dig up the bones, using modern science methodology that hopefully will help identify the lady.
The mystery shrouding the identity of the small portrait, has had scholars and writers debating the possibilities for centuries.
Myths have long claimed that Lisa Gherardini, the wife of wealthy silk merchant Francesco del Giocondo, posed for the portrait. Hence the Italian name of the masterpiece, La Giaconda.
According to the EarthLink article, the marvels of modern science ala CSI will play a major part in the research. The dig will center at the Convent of St. Ursula in Florence, Italy. The merchant had a relationship with the convent, and it is said his wife is buried there.
Ground-penetrating radar will be used to locate the tomb, and if one is discovered, they will try to match the bones and the age of the skeleton, since it is known that she died in her sixties.
If skeletal remains can be identified, then the next process will be carbon dating and DNA extraction to see if it is a match to her children, some of whom were buried in the vicinity.
If skull fragments are found and are usable, there is a possibility of facial reconstruction.
That would certainly prove she was the model. Or would it?
Silvano Vinceti, art historian and project leader claims to have found "symbols" within the portrait that suggest it could have been a longtime male companion of Leonardo's who was the "main influence for the Mona Lisa."
Dan Brown found "symbols" within La Giaconda as well, and had a terrific unbelievable run as a bestselling author.
What wonderful sources of suspense and intrigue can be found in the art world...the possibilities are endless.
Till next time,
Margot Justes
www.mjustes.com
A Hotel in Paris
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
2 comments:
Very interesting post Margot. I read the last article that proclaimed the portrait was really Gian Giacomo Caprotti, da Vinci's apprentice and reputed lover.
Personally, I don't really care who he based the portrait on--I'm just glad he painted it. It's so beautiful and one of my favorites.
Pamala,
They do claim that his lover had an impact on the portrait. Such mysteries are delightful and add to the mystique. Not one of my favorites, for some odd reason it never touched me...but I use it in my paranormal story. Evil energy is trapped between the paint and the wood panel.
Margot
Post a Comment